How Much to Charge for a Financial Plan or Advisory Services

April 25, 2025
8 min read
Table of Contents
how-much-to-charge-financial-plan-advisory

How Much to Charge for a Financial Plan or Advisory Services in 2025

Determining how much to charge for a financial plan and ongoing advisory services is one of the most critical decisions facing small to mid-sized financial advisory firms today. Get it right, and you build a thriving, profitable business that attracts ideal clients. Get it wrong, and you leave significant revenue on the table, undervalue your expertise, or struggle to articulate your worth.

This article cuts through the complexity to provide practical, actionable insights tailored for financial advisors. We’ll explore modern pricing models, key factors influencing your fees, strategies for packaging your services, and how to confidently communicate your value to clients in 2025.

Understanding the Value You Deliver (Beyond the Plan)

Before you can answer how much to charge for a financial plan, you must deeply understand the value you provide. It’s rarely just about the physical document or initial consultation; it’s about the transformation, confidence, and security you bring to your clients’ financial lives over time.

Consider:

  • The problem you solve: Are you helping clients retire early, navigate complex wealth transfer, optimize taxes, or achieve specific financial goals?
  • The expertise you bring: Your certifications (CFP, CFA, etc.), years of experience, specialized knowledge (e.g., serving physicians, business owners, tech executives) are assets.
  • The peace of mind: Quantifying the reduction in stress or anxiety your guidance provides is challenging but a real part of your value.
  • The potential financial gains: While not guaranteed, your advice can lead to better investment performance, tax savings, debt reduction, or optimized spending that significantly outweighs your fee.

Common Financial Advisory Pricing Models

The financial advisory industry is evolving beyond traditional models. Here are the primary approaches used in 2025, with considerations for each:

  • Assets Under Management (AUM): Charging a percentage of the client’s managed assets (e.g., 0.5% - 1.5% annually). This is still prevalent, especially for wealth management. It aligns your success with asset growth but can create conflicts of interest and may not be suitable for clients with significant wealth but limited liquid assets under management.

  • Hourly Fees: Charging a fixed rate per hour (e.g., $150 - $500+). Simple to understand but penalizes efficiency, creates unpredictable client costs, and doesn’t directly tie fee to value or outcomes. It’s often used for one-off consultations or specific project work.

  • Flat/Fixed Fees: Charging a set amount for a defined scope of work, such as a comprehensive financial plan ($1,500 - $7,500+ depending on complexity) or a specific project (e.g., retirement analysis for $1,000 - $3,000). This is gaining popularity as it provides cost certainty for clients and rewards advisor efficiency. It works best with clearly defined deliverables.

  • Retainer/Subscription Fees: Charging a recurring fee (monthly or quarterly) for ongoing access to advice, planning updates, and specific services. Fees can range widely (e.g., $150/month - $1,000+/month) often tiered by complexity, net worth, or income. This model provides stable revenue for the firm and encourages long-term relationships and proactive planning.

  • Value-Based Pricing: Pricing based on the perceived value or tangible results delivered to the client, rather than just time or assets. This requires deep discovery to understand the client’s specific needs and the impact of your advice. It often translates into higher fixed or retainer fees justified by the significant value created. This is often the most profitable model but requires confidence and strong value communication skills.

Many firms now use a hybrid approach, combining elements like a fixed fee for the initial plan followed by a retainer or AUM fee for ongoing services.

Key Factors Influencing Your Pricing

Several factors should inform how much to charge for financial plan services and ongoing advice:

  • Cost of Doing Business: Calculate your overhead, technology costs (including planning software, CRM, and potentially tools like PricingLink (https://pricinglink.com) for presenting fees), staff salaries, marketing, and your desired profit margin. Your fees must cover these costs.
  • Client Complexity: Clients with complex tax situations, multiple income streams, business ownership, intricate estate planning needs, or significant assets/liabilities require more time, expertise, and thus command higher fees.
  • Scope of Services: A comprehensive plan covering investments, retirement, tax, insurance, and estate planning is worth more than a limited engagement focusing only on one area.
  • Your Expertise & Niche: Specialists (e.g., advisors focusing solely on dentists or tech executives) can often charge a premium due to their targeted knowledge and experience.
  • Geographic Location: Pricing can vary based on the cost of living and typical fee structures in your region, though remote work is making this less rigid.
  • Target Client’s Ability/Willingness to Pay: While not the only factor, understanding your ideal client’s financial capacity and their perceived value of financial advice is crucial for alignment.
  • Market Rates: Research what similar firms with comparable expertise and service models are charging in your area or niche. Tools like Kitces.com’s fee surveys can be valuable resources (https://www.kitces.com/financial-advisor-fee-surveys/).

Packaging and Presenting Your Financial Advisory Fees

How you package and present your fees can significantly impact client perception and acceptance. Moving away from a single hourly rate or a complex spreadsheet can be beneficial.

  • Create Service Packages/Tiers: Bundle specific services into distinct packages (e.g., ‘Foundation Planning’, ‘Comprehensive Wealth’, ‘Executive Advisory’). Use clear names and outline what’s included in each. This uses pricing psychology principles like anchoring (showing a higher tier makes lower tiers seem more reasonable) and provides clients with clear choices.

  • Offer Optional Add-ons: Allow clients to customize their package with optional services (e.g., ‘Advanced Tax Modeling’, ‘Business Financial Review’). This uses bundling and allows clients to feel in control while potentially increasing the total engagement value.

  • Focus on Outcomes, Not Inputs: Frame your pricing discussion around the value delivered and the goals the client will achieve, not just the hours you’ll spend or the specific calculations you’ll perform.

  • Provide Price Transparency: Clearly communicate your fees upfront. Avoid hidden costs or surprises. A modern, interactive pricing presentation can greatly help with this.

Presenting these tiered packages and optional add-ons can be challenging with static PDFs or verbal quotes. This is where a tool like PricingLink (https://pricinglink.com) can be very effective. It allows you to create interactive pricing links where clients can select packages, add-ons, and see the total cost update live. This provides a professional, modern experience and simplifies complex fee structures for the client. PricingLink is specifically designed for this pricing presentation step.

For needs beyond just pricing display, like full proposal generation that includes service descriptions, team bios, case studies, and requires e-signatures, you would need more comprehensive proposal software. Tools like PandaDoc (https://www.pandadoc.com), Proposify (https://www.proposify.com), or Ignition (https://ignitionapp.com - often tailored for accountants/advisors) are excellent options for end-to-end proposals and engagement letters. While PricingLink is laser-focused only on making the pricing interaction clear and modern, these other platforms offer a broader suite of proposal features.

Don’t Underprice Your Value

A common mistake, especially for newer advisors or those transitioning away from AUM/hourly, is underpricing. Fear of losing a prospect can lead to quoting fees below your value or even below your operational costs. Remember:

  • Your expertise is valuable. You’ve invested significant time and money into your knowledge.
  • Cheap clients can be difficult clients. Clients focused solely on the lowest price may not value your advice or be a good long-term fit.
  • Higher fees can attract better clients. Clients who understand the value of quality advice are often willing to pay for it.

Conclusion

Determining how much to charge for a financial plan and ongoing advisory services requires careful consideration of your value, costs, target market, and the complexity of the client’s needs. Moving towards value-based, fixed fee, or retainer models can lead to greater profitability and a more sustainable business than relying solely on hourly rates or AUM.

Key Takeaways:

  • Understand and articulate the full value you provide, beyond just the plan document.
  • Explore and potentially adopt fixed fee, retainer, or value-based pricing models.
  • Accurately calculate your business costs to ensure profitability.
  • Package your services into clear, tiered options.
  • Use modern tools (like PricingLink for interactive pricing or PandaDoc for full proposals) to present fees professionally and transparently.
  • Don’t be afraid to charge what you’re worth – communicate your value confidently.

By strategically setting and presenting your fees, financial advisory firms can attract ideal clients, build more predictable revenue streams, and ultimately grow a more profitable and fulfilling business in 2025 and beyond.

Ready to Streamline Your Pricing Communication?

Turn pricing complexity into client clarity. Get PricingLink today and transform how you share your services and value.